An open discussion course designed to review and critically analyse contemporary issues in plant genetics and breeding.
course node page
Academic Department (or campus):
Class Schedule and Location:
Day and time to be determined at first class.
Specific Learning Outcomes:
By the end of the course, the students will be able to:
- Communicate effectively about a genetics and plant breeding subject of current interest in an oral format.
- Communicate effectively in a written format on a topic of current interest to plant breeders and geneticists.
- Formulate and communicate clear and effective answers to questions from student peers.
- Formulate effective questions in a scientific environment.
There are no specific lectures for this course.
This course is structured as discussion sessions. There will be eight - ten, 3 hour classes during the semester, which will consist of student presentations and discussion of the scientific literature relating to Gene Editing.
Students will prepare 20 minute presentations on a set of three current research articles related to the topic.
The presentations will be followed by student-led discussions.
There will be one written assignment on an issue related to Gene Editing, due at the end of the semester.
There are no labs for this course
The main course content is the student presentations and discussions.
Course Assignments and Tests:
Assignment or test
Contribution to Final Grade
In class presentations
40% based on 2 evaluations by peers and instructor
15% based on 2 evaluations by peers and instructor
Participation in discussion
There is no final exam.
There is no required text
There are no recommended texts.
There is no lab manual.
There are no field trips.
There are no additional costs.
All assignments are due just prior to class time and will be submitted in DropBox on Courselink. Presentations will be made in class. Late written assignments will be accepted, with a reduction in mark of 10% for each day it is late, up to 5 days after the due date. Students are expected to read all the assigned papers, attend each class and participate actively in the discussions.
Course Policy on Group Work:
All assignments are to be individual work, conforming with the university policies of academic integrity.
Course Policy regarding use of electronic devices and recording of lectures:
Electronic recording of classes is expressly forbidden without consent of the instructor. When recordings are permitted they are solely for the use of the authorized student and may not be reproduced, or transmitted to others, without the express written consent of the instructor.
Other Course Information:
When you find yourself unable to meet an in-course requirement because of illness or compassionate reasons, please advise the course instructor in writing, with your name, id#, and e-mail contact. See the academic calendar for information on regulations and procedures for Academic Consideration:
- For Graduate Students: https://www.uoguelph.ca/registrar/calendars/graduate/2018-2019/genreg/sec_d0e2182.shtml
- For Undergraduate Students: https://www.uoguelph.ca/registrar/calendars/undergraduate/current/c08/c08-ac.shtml
- For Diploma Students: https://www.uoguelph.ca/registrar/calendars/diploma/current/c08/c08-ac.shtml
The University of Guelph is committed to upholding the highest standards of academic integrity and it is the responsibility of all members of the University community, faculty, staff, and students to be aware of what constitutes academic misconduct and to do as much as possible to prevent academic offences from occurring.
University of Guelph students have the responsibility of abiding by the University's policy on academic misconduct regardless of their location of study; faculty, staff and students have the responsibility of supporting an environment that discourages misconduct. Students need to remain aware that instructors have access to and the right to use electronic and other means of detection. Please note: Whether or not a student intended to commit academic misconduct is not relevant for a finding of guilt. Hurried or careless submission of assignments does not excuse students from responsibility for verifying the academic integrity of their work before submitting it. Students who are in any doubt as to whether an action on their part could be construed as an academic offence should consult with a faculty member or faculty advisor.
The Academic Misconduct Policy is detailed in the University Calenders:
- For Graduate Students: https://www.uoguelph.ca/registrar/calendars/graduate/2018-2019/genreg/sec_d0e2632.shtml
- For Undergraduate Students: https://www.uoguelph.ca/registrar/calendars/undergraduate/current/c08/c08-amisconduct.shtml
- For Diploma Students: https://www.uoguelph.ca/registrar/calendars/diploma/current/c08/c08-amisconduct.shtml
The University of Guelph is committed to creating a barrier-free environment. Providing services for students is a shared responsibility among students, faculty and administrators. This relationship is based on respect of individual rights, the dignity of the individual and the University community's shared commitment to an open and supportive learning environment. Students requiring service or accommodation, whether due to an identified, ongoing disability or a short-term disability should contact the Student Accessibility Services (SAS), formerly Centre for Students with Disabilities (CSD), as soon as possible.
Course Evaluation Information
Your ratings and comments are important. Course evaluation data are used to assess and enhance the quality of teaching and student learning at the University of Guelph. Student course ratings and comments are used as an important component in the Faculty Tenure & Promotion process, and as valuable feedback to help instructors improve their teaching effectiveness and to improve the delivery of the course.
Your responses will not affect your grade. Course evaluation data are distributed to individual instructors after final grades have been submitted to the Registrar, following the completion of each academic semester.
Please be honest, respectful, constructive and thorough. Instructors and review committees place great value on student course ratings and read all comments provided in course evaluations. It is helpful to provide comments on the strengths of the course, in addition to the areas for improvement. Please refrain from personal comments unless they relate to teaching and learning.